Topics / Results and cost

What AI efforts failed or were rolled back?

Tools turned off, experiments abandoned, policies reversed and results that came out negative.

Explore with your AI assistant

Opens a new chat with a prompt that points the assistant to this archive. What it writes is its own, not the archive's: check any quotation on its passage page before you rely on it. Or add the archive to your assistant as a connector: https://the-ai-record.com/mcp (how).

10 passages from 8 organizations; 10 checked against the source. The page states no conclusion: these are the organizations' own words.

We built an automated AI code review GitHub Action in a single day, and we reverted it before the day was over. The idea was simple: someone comments a trigger phrase on a pull request, and a workflow runs our deepest review and posts the result. It took seven small pull requests to get that far, and one revert pull request to undo them.

TradersPostPublished by the organization itself (post), no named author

Post: The AI Review Bot We Reverted, TradersPost blog, October 13, 2026, at Introduction.

Checked against the source [ Grade B ] Said in the last year Passage page

Nobody wrote a postmortem. We did not collect a table of review comments the bot produced, measure their precision, or compare cost against the existing session-based review. So we cannot tell you the bot failed because of noise, or cost, or authentication friction, or a change of mind about where review should live.

TradersPostPublished by the organization itself (post), no named author

Post: The AI Review Bot We Reverted, TradersPost blog, October 13, 2026, at What we do not know.

Checked against the source [ Grade B ] Said in the last year Passage page

Our first approach used a high-level orchestrator agent for this role. It worked, but it was expensive, slow, and sometimes unreliable. … We learned that although an LLM can orchestrate a workflow, predictable coordination is better implemented in code.

StripePublished by the organization itself (post), no named author

Post: Stripe's Payment Method Factory: Orchestrating agents for repeated, custom integrations, Stripe Dot Dev Blog (stripe.dev); authors David Dunne, Xenofon Vourliotis and Sai Samant, September 30, 2026, at Building the factory.

Checked against the source [ Grade B ] Said in the last year Passage page

An agent that has silently lost its tools does not report that it lost its tools. It answers anyway, with the same fluency as before.

Arthur VinbergHead of DevOps & IT · Leader, Ionix

Context. From the post's account of a sandbox failure in which the review agent could not run any commands.

Post: We built an AI PR reviewer. The hard part was teaching it to say nothing., Ionix blog, August 13, 2026, at Two failures that taught us more than the design did.

Checked against the source [ Grade B ] Said in the last year Passage page

But the real problem with all of this is I built this and I hit a little bit of AI psychosis. And I started shipping 10 design docs a day. And soon, the team was fighting my slop. … This last rule was … ship a design doc, you require people to actually go read it. And with this last standard, we suddenly had design docs … incredibly high quality.

Vaibhav GuptaCo-founder and Chief Executive · Executive, Boundary (BoundaryML)

Context. Gupta is describing the design-document tool he built for the team and the rule that followed.

Talk: Fighting Slop with Slop, AI Engineer (YouTube), July 31, 2026, at 3:37.

Checked against the source [ Grade B ] Said in the last year Sells AI tools Passage page

And every morning, we walk into the office to a small incremental PR that's low risk. And when we first did this, it was actually really frustrating, and we turned the loop off … because we had to constantly update the skill, we had to constantly check out the branch, change the skill, change the code, commit and push, and our loop was actually really high friction, right?

Kyle MisteleCo-founder, HumanLayer · Executive, HumanLayer

Context. Mistele has just described scheduling the migration loop to run once a day as a CI workflow, and goes on to the problem HumanLayer hit with the first version.

Talk: Loop Engineering from first principles, AI Engineer (YouTube), July 25, 2026, at 13:48.

Checked against the source [ Grade B ] Said in the last year Sells AI tools Passage page

Locking also caused too much contention. 20 agents would slow to the throughput of 1-3 with most time spent waiting on locks.

Wilson LinResearcher, Cursor (author of the Towards self-driving codebases post) · Practitioner, Cursor (Anysphere)

Post: Towards self-driving codebases, Cursor (own site), February 5, 2026, at Self-coordination.

  • 20 agents agents running, early multi-agent harness with a shared lock file. No person in the loop

Checked against the source [ Grade B ] Said in the last year Cursor (Anysphere): $4 billion revenue, annualised, early June 2026 Sells AI tools Passage page

I think we found that the state-of-the-art in December was you can probably, run this for about two weeks. By the end of those two weeks, you’d find that, hey, you want to, change the color of a button. Well, it turns out this button is implemented in, 10 different places, and they, have All these different variations, and oh, you forgot one of them, and actually it’s a slightly different color in one spot.

Walden YanCo-founder and Chief Product Officer · Executive, Cognition

Context. Yan was describing an internal experiment building real products by auto-merging AI-written code with no code review, to see how many weeks it could run before the codebase became unmanageable.

Podcast: The Age of Async Agents: Cognition's Walden Yan and OpenInspect's Cole Murray, Latent Space, May 28, 2026, at 00:44:21. Reported by Swyx.

Checked against the source [ Grade C ] Said in the last year Sells AI tools Passage page

We need to rethink this and make customer service a human experience. Everyone who wants a human connection should get it.

Sebastian SiemiatkowskiChief Executive Officer and co-founder · Executive, Klarna

Interview: CX Foundation (specialist customer-experience media and analyst site), CX Foundation (specialist customer-experience media and analyst site), February 17, 2026. Reported by Charlie Mitchell.

Checked against the source [ Grade C ] Said in the last year Klarna: $3.5 billion revenue, FY2025 Passage page

JSON: /api/v1/topics/failures-and-reversals.json