Organizations

airCloset

Tokyo-based company running the airCloset monthly fashion-rental subscription, in which stylists pick outfits, plus airCloset Mall, Dress and Salon services.

Website
air-closet.com
Headquarters
Tokyo, Japan
Founded
2014
Ownership
Public company, TSE Growth: 9557

Profile from corp.air-closet.com, corp.air-closet.com, checked November 6, 2026.

Explore with your AI assistant

Opens a new chat with a prompt that points the assistant to this archive. What it writes is its own, not the archive's: check any quotation on its passage page before you rely on it. Or add the archive to your assistant as a connector: https://the-ai-record.com/mcp (how).

4 passages

Every one of those 769 PRs had an AI reviewer as the first reviewer, with an average of 10.8 review-fix loop iterations per PR (max 56). 1 in 5 merged within 10 minutes, roughly half within 30 minutes. What humans do now is look at review outcomes and tune the review prompt and the guidelines themselves -- this is human-on-the-loop, not human-in-the-loop. Humans operate on the policy layer, not the execution layer.

Ryosuke TsujiCTO · Executive

Post: Human-on-the-Loop: AI Reviewing AI PRs at cortex -- 769 PRs/month while raising the quality bar, DEV Community, May 26, 2026, at Start with last month's numbers.

  • 769 pull requests prs merged, 30 days, Apr 21 to May 21. No person in the loop
  • 10.8 iterations per PR avg review iterations, 30 days, Apr 21 to May 21. No person in the loop

Checked against the source [ Grade B ] Said in the last year Passage page

cortex went all-in: the AI writes the code, the AI reviews the code. What humans keep their hands on is "tuning the prompts and guidelines themselves" -- not making decisions inside each individual PR, but watching the system from above and adjusting.

Ryosuke TsujiCTO · Executive

Post: Human-on-the-Loop: AI Reviewing AI PRs at cortex -- 769 PRs/month while raising the quality bar, DEV Community, May 26, 2026, at cortex's answer: move the reviewer role to AI as well.

Checked against the source [ Grade B ] Said in the last year Passage page

cortex hit exactly this. The moment we ran Claude Code at full throttle, writing speed jumped by an order of magnitude or more. Meanwhile the human time available to read and approve PRs only grew linearly. If the reviewer (=me) took a day off, the whole org stalled -- a classic single point of failure.

Ryosuke TsujiCTO · Executive

Post: Human-on-the-Loop: AI Reviewing AI PRs at cortex -- 769 PRs/month while raising the quality bar, DEV Community, May 26, 2026, at How the review bottleneck stops forming.

Checked against the source [ Grade B ] Said in the last year Passage page

When the reviewer's machine receives an event, the script spawns claude -p and walks through 9 dimensions (Graph / Architecture / Security / Test / Doc / Impact / Observability / AI-Antipattern / Recurrence) sequentially, then reads the verdict marker the AI emitted at the end and posts APPROVE or REQUEST_CHANGES via gh pr review.

Ryosuke TsujiCTO · Executive

Post: Human-on-the-Loop: AI Reviewing AI PRs at cortex -- 769 PRs/month while raising the quality bar, DEV Community, May 26, 2026, at How the auto-review system is wired.

Checked against the source [ Grade B ] Said in the last year Passage page