“So the concrete example here is we do security scanning after on our PRs in local and after our PRs even land because they will always find some things that are real that we have overlooked. And they sort of beat humans on the … code review. And it's expensive. It … us, I think like five bucks a PR or something like that to run all the checks that we want. But that's where we made an explicit decision that it's worth it.”
Greg Pstrucha, Developer, Sentry. Engineer describing how his own team runs scans on its pull requests; Sentry sells AI debugging and review tooling.
Sentry sells AI or agent tools or services, so it has a reason to publish flattering numbers about AI. The passage stays in the archive; read it with that in mind.
How this was checked
Checked against the source by a first reader, then confirmed independently by a second reader who fetched the source without seeing the first reader's notes (Independent review agent (Claude Sonnet), blind second pass from passage text and citation only, no repository access, 2026-11-04).
Whisper transcript at about 36:59, answering the moderator's 'Greg, when does a loop pay for itself?'. The ellipses cover 'code review' ('on the code review') and 'costs'. The speaker is the Sentry developer introduced as Greg. Whisper spells the surname 'Costucia', so I could not confirm the 'Pstrucha' spelling from the transcript.
How to cite this passage
Greg Pstrucha (Sentry), “The Great Loops Debate”, AI Engineer (YouTube), 2026-07-17, at 36:59. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c35YoMdnI78 Archived at https://the-ai-record.com/passages/sentry-security-scanning-five-dollars-a-pr-explicit-decision-worth-it-2026
Context. Horthy is answering the moderator's question on how to reach fully autonomous software factories if two to three times is what coding agents give most engineers.