“And so I started tracking the number of iterations, the number of review rounds between when the pull request was opened and when it was merged. Sure enough, very little difference. … Once again, very little if any statistical difference between human-generated and AI-generated pull requests in terms of how many iterations before they're ready to merge.”
Daksh Gupta, Co-founder. Analyzed Greptile's own pull request data (more than a million pull requests in some months) and runs the product he describes; an insider, though Greptile sells AI code review.
Greptile sells AI or agent tooling, so it has a reason to publish flattering numbers about AI. The passage stays in the archive; read it with that in mind.
How this was checked
Checked against the source by a first reader, then confirmed independently by a second reader who fetched the source without seeing the first reader's notes (Independent review agent (Claude Sonnet), blind second pass from passage text and citation only, no repository access, 2026-11-01).
Whisper at 07:57-08:19 matches. The ellipsis omits the garbled 'Devins, pr's, 2.1, codecs, pr's, 2.45, number of review cycles to merge, and humans right in the middle.'
How to cite this passage
Daksh Gupta (Greptile), “AI-Generated Code Is Already Competing With Human Code”, AI Engineer (YouTube), 2026-09-27, at 07:57. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=474j-n1Ltxc Archived at https://the-ai-record.com/passages/greptile-very-little-difference-review-rounds-human-ai-prs-2026