“Atlassian’s internal projects, Rovo Dev generated a higher proportion of bug (2.8x) and maintainability (1.4x) comments, while human reviewers focused more on readability and slightly more design.”
AtlassianPublished by the organization itself (post), no named author
Atlassian sells AI or agent tools or services, so it has a reason to publish flattering numbers about AI. The passage stays in the archive; read it with that in mind.
How this was checked
Checked against the source by a first reader, then confirmed independently by a second reader who fetched the source without seeing the first reader's notes (Independent review agent (Claude Sonnet), blind second pass from passage text and citation only, no repository access, 2026-11-06).
The Results section matches exactly, with a curly apostrophe in Atlassian’s and the 2.8x and 1.4x figures. The passage starts mid-sentence at 'Atlassian’s internal projects', which is fine.
How to cite this passage
Atlassian, “Atlassian Rovo Dev Research: What Types of Code Review Comments Do Developers Most Frequently Resolve?”, Inside Atlassian (Atlassian engineering blog), 2025-11-10, at Results. https://www.atlassian.com/blog/atlassian-engineering/atlassian-rovo-dev-research-what-types-of-code-review-comments-do-developers-most-frequently-resolve Archived at https://the-ai-record.com/passages/atlassian-rovo-dev-generated-higher-proportion-bug-2025